Negotiation is key to business
success. Almost everything that happens within an organisation requires people
to reach an agreement.
While securing investment, hiring
staff or dealing with suppliers are obvious examples, negotiation is also
required in internal conflict resolution, project timelines, establishing
company policies, giving and receiving feedback – the list goes on. That makes
it incredibly important for leaders to hone their negotiation skills.
For this masterclass, we speak to
two experts. The first, Sue Williams, is a former senior detective with the
Metropolitan Police and an expert in hostage negotiation. She was involved in
the successful resolution of hundreds of kidnap and hostage situations both on
land and at sea. She now serves as a member of the risk and advisory board at
the risk management firm Healix.
The second, George Kohlrieser, is
a professor of leadership and organisational behaviour at the International
Institute for Management Development. He is also the author of Hostage at the table: How leaders can overcome conflict, influence others and raise performance.
He has worked with global
companies and their leaders in more than 100 countries. Before that, he worked
with the police, the military and humanitarian organisations in Israel, the
Palestinian territories and Croatia. During his work, he has been taken hostage
four times – and used his skills to negotiate his way out.
VIDEO
- Sue Williams framework
While not every negotiation in
business is as intense as a hostage situation, the fundamentals are the same.
Before a note has been taken or a word spoken, you need to make sure you are
prepared.
“Find out all about the people. Find out all
about the issue. Find out about the commodity itself,” says Williams. “I know
we are all busy people, but putting time in the diary to prepare for a
negotiation really does pay off. You go in more confident, and it cuts down on
surprises.”
Preparation doesn’t just cover the other party.
You need to prepare your own mental and emotional state as well. Practising a negotiation
with someone in your organisation or a person you trust using methods such as visualisation
can be useful to help understand your emotions and be prepared.
The experts also recommend not making
negotiation personal and keeping the outcome in mind. Focus on interests and
not positions. Be sure to factor in unforeseen circumstances and concessions
you are willing to make, setting a firm foundation for you to work from.
Then the focus shifts to connection. “First
of all, you’ve got to get your counterpart to like you,” says Williams. This is
the first step in building trust, something which any negotiation relies on. “The
relationship-building in negotiation is so important. It's about building rapport
and using empathy.”
VIDEO - George
Kohlrieser manipulation vs influencing
Kohlrieser agrees: “It's about understanding
the person. Some of the biggest mistakes that can derail a negotiation happen
at this stage.” He adds: “People don’t listen. They talk too much and focus on
what they want, or on the goal or object. You are dealing with a person. This
goes a long way to finding common ground.”
Hostage negotiators have a superpower:
listening. That is key in business too. “A lot of people think that we are just
fancy wordsmiths and we know how to manipulate people through words but that is
not true,” says Williams. “Active listening is undervalued. Once you engage in
it, then you find out so much more about the situation, about the person. This
is the difference between listening and hearing.”
One way to do this is with open-ended
questions. In his book Supercommunicators, Charles Duhigg illustrates
how subtle shifts in the way we ask questions can elicit a dramatically
different response.
“Rather than asking someone about the facts
of their life, ask them how they feel about their life,” he says. For example,
instead of asking a doctor where they work, you might ask, what made you decide
to become a doctor? This invites them to share something meaningful, allowing
for a deeper connection.
“As you are fact finding and asking
questions,” says Williams, “peel back the layers and find out the true
motivation of what people want out of this negotiation. Establish, is it really
a negotiation, or is it just a fact-finding mission? You’ve got to be adaptable
and make yourself approachable. I often describe myself as having to be a
convincing chameleon, because I have to be what the person I am communicating
with wants me to be.”
VIDEO - George
Kohlrieser bullying
Open questions can be used to gather
information, but combining them with closed questions can narrow in on a
specific goal or desired outcome. Duhigg refers to this as “looping for
understanding”. It’s a delicate balance of open and closed questions. Here’s
how it works in his own words:
Ask questions to make sure you understand what someone has said. Repeat
back, in your own words, what you heard. Ask if you got it right. Continue
until everyone agrees we understand. It’s a fairly simple technique — prove you
are listening by asking the speaker questions, reflecting back what you just
heard and then seeking confirmation you understand — but studies show it is the
single most effective technique for proving to someone that we want to hear
them. The goal is not to repeat what someone has said verbatim, but rather to distil
the other person’s thoughts in your own words, prove you are working hard to
understand and see their perspective – and then repeat the process, again and
again, until everyone is satisfied.
Williams points to a common pitfall of not
making the effort to understand the opposite party’s perspective. Just approaching the negotiation through your
world view, agenda and what you want can be a recipe for disaster. Look at
their challenges, culture and true motivation. This ability to step into the
other party’s shoes isn’t just strategic, it’s emotional intelligence in action.
VIDEO - Sue
Williams clip top tips
The best negotiators can be likened to
orchestral conductors. As with music, negotiation is not a rational process; it’s
an emotional process, according to Kohlrieser.
“There has been a big mistake made in the
whole development of leaders,” he says, “and that is that we are rational
beings who happen to think. But it’s the other way around.”
He suggests involving a choice to help
understand the person’s reaction: “If they become belligerent, you use de-escalating
techniques. If they’re not emotional enough or don’t have enough energy, you
have to provoke a little bit. You have to be careful with that but aim to understand
their emotional triggers.”
De-escalating techniques include maintaining
a steady and normal voice, not matching their pitch or volume, keeping eye
contact and looping for understanding. “If it’s appropriate, and if there’s a
reason for it, use a ‘sorry’,” says Williams. “It’s a really important de-escalation
tool because people aren’t usually expecting it. But if you say sorry, make sure
it’s a real one.”
VIDEO - George
Kohlrieser top tips
This emotional intelligence must also extend
to your own state, especially empathy. It is sometimes described as the
lubricant of negotiation and Williams believes this is true. It helps people
understand their own feelings, but more importantly, their counterpart’s
emotions.
She also suggests that you should never
assume the outcome of a negotiation: “Sometimes I thought, ‘Oh, this is going
to be very difficult’ or ‘this is going to be very tragic’ and actually it wasn’t.
Don’t prejudge the outcome of any negotiation because your body language will give
it away, or your mind is not going to be as open as it needs to be. It’s not
over till it’s over.”
Related and recommended
The auto industry entrepreneur believes smart pivots can be the start button to fire up business success
Knowing how to get agreement between two parties is key in business. Two experts who have dealt with life-and-death negotiations offer their insight
The hotel executive believes the hospitality industry needs to be proactive in hiring to reflect society
The legendary ad exec believes leaders should collaborate with the technology, rather than use it as a tool